Steve Fenwick
2004-02-22 07:59:48 UTC
A somewhat contrarian opinion:
Herself and I were looking for dinner tonight around 8PM, so we tried
trolling Castro Street, and hooked a Cantankerous Fish. The clue should
have been that Cascal, next door, had a 45-minute wait and Cantankerous
Fish was a walk-in. While it wasn't a bad meal, it certainly wasn't good
for the price. I saw Mr. Amacher's review just now, and we had a
distinctly different result.
The ambiance is medium-loud; we could hold a conversation tolerably
well, but it's definitely not a quiet dining spot. The table we were at
had marginal clearance for staff and diners to pass--not as bad as
Zucca's by-the-mirror tables, though. The kitchen noise was evident, but
the high counter backsplash cut off much of the theater of the open
kitchen.
We started with the steamed clams. These were quite good, particlarly
with a little fresh lemon, and presaged a good meal. Alas...
I had the trout; she had the scallops. The trout was nicely browned and
flavored with a lemony beurre blanc. The accompanying blue lake beans
were only lightly steamed, which I liked (good crunch), but she didn't.
The jasmine rice I requested in place of the mashed potatoes were hot,
just right in stickiness, and complemented the fish nicely.
Alas, the scallops. An odd seasoning and decidely too-soft texture
suggested poor preparation. Her rice was also much cooler. It was as
though I had gotten the efforts of the head chef, and she a new
sous-chef. While not bad enough to send back, definitely not worth the
tab. She who dislikes most fish agreed that I got the better entree.
We tried the desserts to see if they were better. The cheesecake scored
a hit with herself; even though the berries (raspberries and
blackberries) appeared to have been frozen (well out of season around
here), the lack of bottom crust went down well. The warm chocolate,
unfortunately, was only slightly above room temperature. The chocolate
sauce was nicely bitter, for those who like dark chocolates.
Service was mediocre at best. The waiter tried to take our order under a
minute after we had been seated. No specials were read (do they have
any?) We ordered drinks and deferred our main order. This lead to a long
delay in getting our order in (maybe 10 minutes of good sourdough bread
and table water). The clams were delivered promptly, but while we were
still on the last two, the waiter delivered the entrees. After that, he
was essentially invisible, until we were obviously well past done with
the entrees. We ordered desserts; after that, the waiter sort of tossed
two spoons on the table (presumably for the ice cream with each
dessert). A different waiter brought dessert; our original waiter
deposited the check, then proceeded to ignore us again. The hostess
eventually took the check.
With no wine, we were out $72 (one appetizer, two entrees, two desserts,
one soft drink, one large mineral water). Given that we could have had a
much better meal at Zucca for the same price, or two at Pasta? for a
little more, I don't see much reason to return. I'll wait for another
ba.foodie (or two) to negate our experience with positive ones before
going back.
Steve
Herself and I were looking for dinner tonight around 8PM, so we tried
trolling Castro Street, and hooked a Cantankerous Fish. The clue should
have been that Cascal, next door, had a 45-minute wait and Cantankerous
Fish was a walk-in. While it wasn't a bad meal, it certainly wasn't good
for the price. I saw Mr. Amacher's review just now, and we had a
distinctly different result.
The ambiance is medium-loud; we could hold a conversation tolerably
well, but it's definitely not a quiet dining spot. The table we were at
had marginal clearance for staff and diners to pass--not as bad as
Zucca's by-the-mirror tables, though. The kitchen noise was evident, but
the high counter backsplash cut off much of the theater of the open
kitchen.
We started with the steamed clams. These were quite good, particlarly
with a little fresh lemon, and presaged a good meal. Alas...
I had the trout; she had the scallops. The trout was nicely browned and
flavored with a lemony beurre blanc. The accompanying blue lake beans
were only lightly steamed, which I liked (good crunch), but she didn't.
The jasmine rice I requested in place of the mashed potatoes were hot,
just right in stickiness, and complemented the fish nicely.
Alas, the scallops. An odd seasoning and decidely too-soft texture
suggested poor preparation. Her rice was also much cooler. It was as
though I had gotten the efforts of the head chef, and she a new
sous-chef. While not bad enough to send back, definitely not worth the
tab. She who dislikes most fish agreed that I got the better entree.
We tried the desserts to see if they were better. The cheesecake scored
a hit with herself; even though the berries (raspberries and
blackberries) appeared to have been frozen (well out of season around
here), the lack of bottom crust went down well. The warm chocolate,
unfortunately, was only slightly above room temperature. The chocolate
sauce was nicely bitter, for those who like dark chocolates.
Service was mediocre at best. The waiter tried to take our order under a
minute after we had been seated. No specials were read (do they have
any?) We ordered drinks and deferred our main order. This lead to a long
delay in getting our order in (maybe 10 minutes of good sourdough bread
and table water). The clams were delivered promptly, but while we were
still on the last two, the waiter delivered the entrees. After that, he
was essentially invisible, until we were obviously well past done with
the entrees. We ordered desserts; after that, the waiter sort of tossed
two spoons on the table (presumably for the ice cream with each
dessert). A different waiter brought dessert; our original waiter
deposited the check, then proceeded to ignore us again. The hostess
eventually took the check.
With no wine, we were out $72 (one appetizer, two entrees, two desserts,
one soft drink, one large mineral water). Given that we could have had a
much better meal at Zucca for the same price, or two at Pasta? for a
little more, I don't see much reason to return. I'll wait for another
ba.foodie (or two) to negate our experience with positive ones before
going back.
Steve
--
steve <at> w0x0f <dot> com
steve <at> w0x0f <dot> com